![]() ![]() ![]() “It’s clear that the Biden administration, while it had two years to prepare for the end of Title 42, failed to do so,” Sinema told reporters. ![]() Kyrsten Sinema, an Arizona independent who accepts committee assignments from Democrats, to push a bill that would resurrect the government’s power to quickly expel migrants, without processing their asylum claims, for another two years. 2 Senate Democrat, is introducing legislation that would assist border officials and speed up the asylum application process. The unwieldy nature of immigration legislation has befuddled Congress for decades, but there is a growing conversation in the Senate on the issue.Ī small group of House and Senate lawmakers hopes the House bill could give momentum for a separate package in the works that would incorporate aggressive border enforcement with expanding legal immigration through work visas, as well as potentially a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. The program is a cornerstone of Biden’s immigration efforts, allowing migrants from those countries to apply to come to the U.S. officials to accept or quickly turn away some migrants from Venezuela, Haiti and Nicaragua. The bill would also scrap a program that has allowed U.S. “It will build a medieval border wall that is a 14th-century solution to a 21st-century problem.” Hakeem Jeffries, the top House Democrat, said at a Thursday news conference. “This extreme MAGA Republican piece of legislation will throw out children who are fleeing, in many cases, extreme violence and persecution,” Rep. It would also restrict asylum by requiring migrants to cross legally, pay a $50 fee and meet more stringent requirements to show in initial interviews that they have a credible fear of persecution in their home country. The package would return to many of the same policies pursued by former President Donald Trump, such as building walls along the border. while they wait for their asylum claim to be processed in court. and international law give migrants the right to seek asylum from political, religious or racial persecution, but conservatives say many people take advantage of the current system to live and work in the U.S. The 213-page bill represents a compromise in the Republican conference between mainstream lawmakers, who wanted to focus on beefing up border enforcement, and hardline conservatives, who want to see drastic changes to U.S. Even as the legislation neared final form Wednesday, it had to be amended to appease concerns from the House Freedom Caucus and other lawmakers. It took months, however, for Republicans to push the bill through the House amid sometimes public feuds between GOP lawmakers over the legislation. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy called the package “the strongest border security bill this country has ever seen,” saying in a speech on the House floor that “meanwhile, we are seeing a very different record from President Biden.” Passing the bill would ensure House GOP lawmakers can say they did their part to deliver on a campaign promise to secure the border. Republicans have sought to slam Biden for the increase in illegal immigration during his tenure. officials use a new set of policies that aim to clamp down on illegal immigration while offering more legal pathways. Biden has conceded that the southern border will be “chaotic for a while” as migrants weigh whether to cross and U.S. The House GOP pointedly voted on the bill the same day as the expiration of Title 42, a public health emergency rule that allowed border authorities to quickly return many migrants who crossed the border illegally. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and John Duarte of California, voting against it. The legislation passed 219-213, with all present Democrats and two Republicans, Reps. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |